Next, the Credit CARD Act will head to the full Senate for a vote, and the Credit Cardholders Bill of Rights will be addressed by the full House Financial Services Committee and then (hopefully) the full House.
If both are passed, they will be reconciled in a joint Senate/House Committee. Read more about the legislative process here.
The Senate's bill would go into effect 9 months after passage, whereas the House bill would go into effect either one year from passage or on July 1, 2010, whichever comes first.
Either time frame is too long!
Click here to ask Congress to speed up the implementation process!
Both Bills Would:
- Ban Double-Cycle Billing,
- Require issuers to mail bills at least 21 days before the due date, and
- Prevent issuers from charging a late fee if payment was mailed at least 7 days before the due date.
In addition, the Senate's Credit CARD Act would:
- Eliminate "retroactive" rate increases, where an issuer increases the interest rate on existing credit card balances,
- Eliminate "universal default," where an issuer raises interest rates because of something other than the cardholder's performance on that card (for example, making a late payment on a different credit card),
- Require that payments are allocated first to the balance with the highest interest rate,
- Mandate that penalty fess be reasonably related to costs, and
- Limit aggressive marketing, and irresponsible lending, to young consumers without the ability to repay debt.
The House's Credit Cardholders Bill of Rights addresses some of these issues, but does not go quite as far in protecting consumers. For example, it would prohibit retroactive rate increases in some but not all circumstances, and would require that payments are allocated either proportionately across all a cardholders' balances, or are allocated to the highest balance first.
Source: Americans For Fairness In Lending (AFFIL.org)
read about the Senate's Credit CARD Act
Leave a comment